Tapen Sen, J.

1. Heard Mr. Prabhash Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, learned GP-II for the State respondents,

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order as contained in Annexure 3 passed by the Superintendent of Police, Singhbhum (West) at Chaibasa whereby and whereunder the petitioner was dismissed from service. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the appellate order passed by the Deputy Inspector General oi Police, South Chhotanagpur Range being the order issued on 14.12.1995 (Annexure 4) conforming the order of dismissal.

3. Evidently and as is apparent from the enquiry report that has been brought on record by the respondents themselves vide Annexure A in the counter affidavit of the respondent No. 3, the petitioner was proceeded against for the following offences :

(a) for refusing to accept a command for being present on duty on 6.12.1991 on the occasion of Bharat Band;

(b) for not being present and on duty on the arrival of Swami Shankaracharaya; and

(c) misbehaviour with one Mchiuddin, a personnel of the police department,.

4. The enquiry report discloses that for the offences in relation to 6.2.1991, it has been found that the petiti