SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 1199

VIKRAMADITYA PRASAD
Ramanand Sah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

VIKRAMADITYA PRASAD, J.

1. This is a petition for quashing the order dated 15.7.2002 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka in PCR Case No. 272/0.1, GR No. 362/02, whereby and whereunder the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence under Section 147/500/503/ 504, IPC.

2. It transpires that one Balram Bhagat had filed a complaint against the petitioner alleging, inter alia, that though there was no order restraining the complainant, but the accused of that case (petitioner here) misled the police that there was an order of the Court and consequently got the work stopped and because of the stoppage of the work, there was loss caused to the complainant, besides he also intermediated him and threatened the masons working there.

3. Since the offence disclosed was non-conginzable, it appears that the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate referred it to the police for investigation. It further transpires that after investigation, the police submitted charge- sheet of the offence under Section 182/147/500/509/504, IPC against the accused Ramanand Sah and thereon, the learned Magistrate passed the following order :--

"15.7.2002 Abhiyukt Ramanand Sah ka Prat














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top