SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 1169

GURUSHARAN SHARMA
Pitambar Singh Manki @ Pitambar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Makar Singh – Respondent


ORDER

Gurusharan Sharma, J.

1. Heard. In Title Partition Suit No. 38 of 2001, the summons were served on the defendants 1 and 2 and thereafter both of them appeared together in the suit on 30.8.2002 and filed a petition for granting time to file written statement, which was allowed and they were permitted to file written statement by 9.9.2002. As no written statement was filed, on 13.12.2002 the plaintiffs filed a petition for proceeding the suit under Order VIII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was directed to be put up for hearing on 10.1.2003 and the defendants 1 and 2 were given one more indulgence to file written statement in the meantime. Again on 10.1.2003 the defendants 1 and 2 filed petition for granting further time to file written statement, which was kept on record, however, on 23.1.2003 the defendants 1 and 2 were debarred to file written statement under proviso to Order VIII, Rule 1 of the Code. The defendants I and 2 failed to file written statement maximum within 90 days from the date of the service of summons of the suit on them. Admitted position is that the defendants. 1 and 2 appeared in the suit on 30.8.2002 and in spite of indulgences granted by the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top