SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 1302

VISHNUDEO NARAYAN
Jamhir Ansari – Appellant
Versus
Ketna Organ – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vishnudeo Narayan, J.

1. This appeal at the instance of plaintiff-appellant is directed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 16.3.1988 and 30.3.1988 passed in Title Appeal No. 9 of 1983/14 of 1983 by Shri B.N. Singh, 1st Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi whereby and whereunder the said appeal was dismissed affirming the judgment and decree dated 22.12.1982 and 10.1.1983 passed in Title Suit No. 202 of 1981/62 of 1982 by Shri Ram Nath, Additional Sub-Judge, Ranchi.

2. The original plaintiff-appellant has died during the pendency of this appeal and her heir and legal representative stands substituted in this case.

3. The plaintiff-appellant had filed the aforementioned suit for declaration of her title in respect of the suit plot detailed in the Schedule at the foot of the plaint.

4. The case of the original plaintiff-appellant, in brief, is that the suit plot aforesaid was recorded in the Revisional Survey Records of Right in the name of her father Sheikh Shohabat as "Kaimi Adhbataidar" under Most. Sushila Kuar, the landlord, under khata No. 104 of village Kharta and the said Sheikh Shohabat, being a Kaimi Adhbataidar is a tenant with occupancy rights and is not


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top