M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. Heard Mr. Biren Poddar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Manjul Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the State and Mr. V. P. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the RRDA.

2. The short question that falls for consideration is whether the impugned order passed by the Circle Officer rejecting the application of the petitioner for mutation of her name is justified in the facts of the present case. It appears that the petitioner purchased the land measuring 10 Kattas comprised within Khata 34 and 54 Plot No. 853 and 854 at Mauza Bariatu P.S. Ranchi by virtue of registered deed of sale No. 8283 dated 8.10. 1993 and came in possession of the same. After purchase, she filed an application for mutation in respect of the said land before the Circle Officer, Ranchi which was registered as Mutation Case No. 3785-R 27/2002-03. The Circle Officer on receipt of the application issued notices and called for report from the Halka Karamchari and Circle In-spector. The Halka Karamchari and Circle Inspector reported that the land in question is in possession of the petitioner but this land is also the subject matter of Vigilance Case Nos, 10 and 13. On the afore