SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 1345

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. This writ petition has been preferred by the writ petitioner for a direction on the respondents to pay him the retiral benefits, such as, regular and revised pension, leave salary, gratuity and G.P.F. along with 18% penal interest, besides statutory interest, as also cost of litigation of Rs. 10.000/-.

2. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as Karmchari and thereafter, promoted to the post of Circle Inspector. Ultimately he retired from the services of the State on 30th June, 1996 as Circle Inspector, Khuntpani Circle, Chaibasa. He filed several representations for payment of regular pension and pension in the revised scale of pay as also the other retiral benefits but most of them were not paid. On the other hand, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, vide memo No. Pen-7-190, dated 4th June, 1997 directed for recovery of certain amount from the petitioner on account of his non-passing of Hindi Noting and Drafting Examination,

3. The stand taken by the Accountant General, Bihar, is that due to some major objections, the service book and pension papers of the petitioner were returned to the Department vide letter No. Pen-7-189, dated 30th May, 19






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top