Tapen Sen, J.

1. Heard Mr. B.B. Sinha, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners; Mr. Manoj Tandon for the respondent Nos. 4 to 6 and Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, learned G.P. II for the State-respondents.

2. Petitioners, in the instant case, have prayed for quashing of the order dated 25.08.2002 as contained in Annexure 4 passed by the Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division in Settlement Case No. 201 of 2000-2001, which was filed under Section 25 of the Santhal Pargana Settlement Regulation Act, 1872. By reason of the said application the petitioners had prayed for correction in the records of rights and made a prayer that an inquiry should be held afresh so that the matter may be inquired into by a competent authority who is involved in a Settlement Proceeding which is said to be going on. Upon perusal of the impugned order which has been sought to be challenged in the said Settlement Case, it is evident that the Gangtzers Service Settlement operation had been completed in this District during the period 1929-35 and record of rights had finally been published. It is also evident that the instant application under Section 25 of the aforementioned Regulations was filed in the year