SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 166

AMARESHWAR SAHAY
Chittaranjan Chaturvedi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amareshwar Sahay, J.

1. The petitioner, in this writ application has prayed for quashing of Notification as contained in Annexure- 5 dated 15.1.1996, issued by the Government of Bihar, Department of Mines and Geology, by which. Indra Deo Paswan, District Mining Officer was promoted to the post of Deputy Director (Mines) with retrospective effect from 21.6.1993, whereas the petitioner was promoted as Deputy Director (Mines) with effect from 1.2.1994. The further prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is to quash the Notification dated 5.3.1995 issued by the Government of Bihar, whereby the respondent No. 4, Indra Deo Paswan was made Additional Director (Mines) on officiating basis.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he was promoted to the post of District Mining Officer on 29.1.1972, whereas the respondent No. 4 was appointed as District Mining Officer on 21.6.1983. It is said that the petitioner as well as the respondent No. 4, Indra Deo Paswan were made the Deputy Director of Mines vide Notification dated 20.6.1986 as contained in Annexure-2 to the writ application.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that by issue of Annexure-5 i.e. the Notification dated 15.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top