SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 252

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, LAKSHMAN URAON
Sangi Hambram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Lakshman Uraon, J.

1. The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 31.5.1997, passed by Sri J.K. Narayan, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Seraikella, in Sessions Trial No. 179 of 1993 (G.R. No. 545 of 1992), whereby and whereunder, all the three appellants have been convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code and each of them has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- each and in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. They have further been convicted under Section 452 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years. However, the sentences in respect of all the appellants have been ordered to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution case is based on the First Information Report, lodged by Duni Purty (PW 8), recorded on 16.9.1992 at 18.30 hours regarding an occurrence, which took place in the night of 15/16th September, 1992 in between 9.00 p.m. of 15th September, 1992 till 3.00 a.m., the early morning of 16th September, 1992. The informant Duni Purty (PW 8) has alleged that in the night of 15.9.1

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top