SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 362

AMARESHWAR SAHAY
Employees In Relation To Management Of Central Horticultural Experiment Station – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2 – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amareshwar Sahay, J.

1. The award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, at Dhanbad in Ref. Case No. 20 of 1990, is under challenge in this writ application by the Management of Central Horticultural Experiment Station, Ranchi, whereby, in answer to the reference, the Presiding Officer, held that the Central Horticulture Experiment Station is an "Industry" and the concerned workmen are the workman within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act and they deserved their regularization and payment of Group-D pay scales and accordingly the management was directed to regularize the services of all the concerned workmen and to pay them Group-D pay scale which was the lowest pay scale of the institute.

2. According to the case of the petitioner, the Central Horticultural Experiment Station (Hereinafter referred to as "CHES" in short) is one of several Regional Research Stations of the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), Bangalore, which itself is one of about 50 Research Institute of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) New Delhi, located throughout the country.

3. Main objectives of CHES are to develop better varieties of importan




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top