SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 516

M.Y.EQBAL
Amresh Chandra Jha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. Petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the respondents whereby his claim for payment of 20 per cent additional pay for discharging the additional duty of Director, Agriculture for a period from 1.2.1999 to 31.12.2000 has been rejected.

2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass :

Petitioner, at the relevant time, was appointed as Joint Director, Agriculture Centre, in Divisional Agriculture Office, Ranchi on 11.12.1998 and remained on the said post till his retirement i.e. 31.12.2000. Petitioners case in that while he was posted as Joint Director, Agriculture he was given additional charge of Director, Agriculture from 1.2.1999 to 31.12.2000. During that period petitioner said to have discharged full duty of Director, Agriculture and became entitled to 20 per cent extra emoluments for discharging the additional work of Director. Agriculture. It is contended by the petitioner that he filed several representations for payment of additional allowance but the same was not paid till the date of his retirement. After retirement petitioner filed writ petition being WPS No. 3444/2001 for payment of all the retiral dues including 20 per cent emoluments which






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top