AMARESHWAR SAHAY
Sukro Orain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Amareshwar Sahay, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. The respondent No. 5 Singha Oraon, filed an application for restoration of Plot No. 1061 under khata No. 177 of Village Karkarra under Section 71-A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act alleging therein that the transfer of the land was made in contravention of the provision of Chotanagpur Tenancy Act. The respondent No. 4, Special Regulation Officer, vide order as contained in Annexure-5, passed an order for restoration of the land in favour of respondent No. 5. Against the said order passed by respondent No. 4 the writ petitioner preferred an appeal before the Additional Collector, Ranchi, which was dismissed vide order as contained in Annexure-6. Thereafter, the petitioner-preferred revision under Section 217 of Chotanagpur Tenancy Act before the Commissioner, South Chotanagpur Division, Ranchi, which was also dismissed vide order as contained in Annexure 7. The petitioner has challenged the aforesaid three orders passed by the Special Regulation Officer, the Additional Collector and of the Commissioner.
3. The case of the petitioner in short is that in the Revisional Survey Records of Right, khata No. 177 of Village Karkarra P.S. Mand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.