S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. In all the cases, some of the questions being common and there being common petitioner in two writ petitions, they were taken up for hearing together, but nobody appeared in CWJC. No. 3839 of 1993 (R) - Jamshedpur Cement Ltd. v. Bihar State Electricity Board and Anr..

2. In CWJC No. 746 of 1992 (R), the petitioner Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the TISCO) has challenged the order dated 24th December, 1991 passed by the Chief Engineer, South Bihar Chotanagpur Electricity Board, Ranchi (hereinafter referred to as the General Manager, Ranchi), whereby and whereunder, he allowed part of the claim of petitioner made under Clause 13 of the High Tension Agreement (hereinafter referred to as H.T. agreement) for reduction from the Annual Minimum Guarantee Charges (hereinafter referred to as the AMG charges) and Maximum Demand Charges (hereinafter referred to as the M.D. charges) in respect of the years 1977-78; 78-79 & 82-83.

The petitioner TISCO has also challenged the AMG Bills of the aforesaid years 1977-78; 78-79 & 82-83.

3. In CWJC No. 2574 of 1993 (R), the petitioner TISCO has challenged the order dated 17th August, 1993 passed by t