SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 871

P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN, HARI SHANKAR PRASAD
Bhalotia Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.K. Balasubramanyan, C.J.

1. At the instance of the assessee, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench has referred the following question for our opinion under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act.

"Whether the acceptance of share application money in case amounting to Rs. 20,000/- or more violates the provisions of Section 269SS."

2. During the course of the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1990-91, it was found by the assessing officer that the assessee, a private limited company, had accepted amounts ofRs. 20.000/- and more in cash from ten persons as entered in its books. The assessments were completed on that basis. But the order of assessment is not before us. Thus, the receipt by the assessee of sums in cash exceeding Rs. 20.000/- (rupees twenty thousand) during the relevant assessment year is not in dispute before us. Holding that the amounts were received in cash in violation of Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act. the assessing officer initiated a penalty proceeding under Section 271D of the Act, Section 271D reads as under :-

"(1) If a person takes or accepts any loan or deposit in contravention of the provisions of Section 269SS, he shall be li




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top