Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the judgment and decree of affirmance passed by the District Judge, Seraikella-Kharsawan in Title Appeal No. 62/99 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and decree dated 14.9.99 passed by the Munsif, Serikella in Title Suit No. 5/92.

2. Both the Courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff- respondent has valid and legal right, title and interest. The plaintiffs suit was decreed on contest and after thorough appraisal of evidences and materials on record. On appeal, the said judgment and decree of the trial Court has been found sound and legal and on thorough consideration of the facts and points of law.

3. In this appeal Mr. Umesh Pd. Singh learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that judgment and decrees of the Courts below are vitiated on account of non-consideration of materials on record and for not framing proper and relevant issues. From perusal of the judgment and decree of the trial Court, I find that all the relevant issues were framed and the evidences and materials on record have been dealt with in detail. After discussing and cons