SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 1072

HARI SHANKAR PRASAD
Allahabad Bank – Appellant
Versus
Mecon – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hari Shankar Prasad, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 1lth February, 2003 and decree dated 21.2.2003 passed in Money Suit No. 83 of 1996 whereby the learned Sub-Judge-IV, Ranchi decreed the suit.

2. The case of the plaintiff-respondent, in brief, is that the Regional Manager of defendants, by his letter dated 20.2.1992 requested the plaintiff- MECON Company to enlist them as bankers of the plaintiff and requested for opening an account with them. After discussions held on 26.2.1992 with the General Manager, Deputy General Manager and Regional Manager of the defendants about specific requirement of Banking Services, the defendants, vide their letter dated 27.2.1992 intimated their acceptance to provide the following services on opening an account with them.

(i) Cheque received from the plaintiff would be given instant credit without any charge. (ii) Remittance to plaintiff s outstation branches would be done free of cost.

(iii) Cash would be remitted to plaintiffs office at their cost, and

(iv) They invited proposal of Bank Guarantee, from the plaintiff for their consideration.

3. The plaintiff, in response to their letter dated 27.2.1992 informed the



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top