SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 28

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, M.Y.EQBAL
Mithilesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Government Of India Through Central Vigilance Commission – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 2nd December, 2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 5996 of 2004, whereby and whereunder, the writ petition preferred by the appellant with prayer to quash the departmental proceeding, has been dismissed.

2. The brief fact of the case is that the appellant while posted as Technical Secretary to the Director (Technical) at Singrauli, he was served with a show cause notice bearing No. NCL/Vig/INV/8-03/830 dated 24th November, 2003 whereby he was asked to show cause to the alleged irregularities as were set out in the said show cause notice. The appellant having received the show cause, replied to each and every irregularities and illegalities as were pointed out in different sub-clauses of clause (iv) of the show cause notice. One of the pleas taken was that he had no role to play in the matter of a tender, which gave rise to the irregularities as were alleged.

3. It appears that the competent authority being not satisfied, issued a departmental proceeding vide Memorandum No. NCL/Vig/RDA-MKG/8-03/616 dated 18th September, 2004. Eight articles of char






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top