SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 3

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, N.N.TIWARI
Swapan Adhikari – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


ORDER

1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the judgment and order dated 12th March, 2004 passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna, Bench at Ranchi in original application No. 351/2003, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal dismissed the application.

2. The brief fact of the case is that the petitioner was appointed as Deputy Directors of Mines and Safety under the Ministry of Labour, Government of India and was posted at Dhanbad. Thereafter, he was transferred from Dhanbad to Hyderabad. Subsequently, he was promoted to the next higher post of Directors of Mines and Safety on ad hoc basis and was posted at Dhanbad. In the meantime, an FIR was lodged by Central Bureau of Investigation against him at Bhuvaneshwar in which charge sheet was submitted on 20th November, 1994. The trial of the criminal proceeding started and more than thirty-six witnesses were examined. When the question of regular promotion was taken up, the Departmental Promotion Committee considered the cases of all the eligible regular Deputy Directors wherein, the name of the petitioner stood at serial No. 6 of the Seniority list. As the criminal case was pending against the p





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top