SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, N.N.TIWARI
Swapan Adhikari – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the judgment and order dated 12th March, 2004 passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna, Bench at Ranchi in original application No. 351/2003, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal dismissed the application.
2. The brief fact of the case is that the petitioner was appointed as Deputy Directors of Mines and Safety under the Ministry of Labour, Government of India and was posted at Dhanbad. Thereafter, he was transferred from Dhanbad to Hyderabad. Subsequently, he was promoted to the next higher post of Directors of Mines and Safety on ad hoc basis and was posted at Dhanbad. In the meantime, an FIR was lodged by Central Bureau of Investigation against him at Bhuvaneshwar in which charge sheet was submitted on 20th November, 1994. The trial of the criminal proceeding started and more than thirty-six witnesses were examined. When the question of regular promotion was taken up, the Departmental Promotion Committee considered the cases of all the eligible regular Deputy Directors wherein, the name of the petitioner stood at serial No. 6 of the Seniority list. As the criminal case was pending against the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.