SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 278

M.Y.EQBAL
Ghanshyam Dusadh – Appellant
Versus
Kishun Dusadh – Respondent


ORDER

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. This writ application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 18.11.2003 passed by District Judge, Hazaribagh in Title Appeal No. 9 of 2000 whereby amendment application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff has been rejected.

3. The original plaintiff/petitioners filed a suit being Title suit No. 21 of 1994 for the following reliefs :

(a) That the wrong entry in register II be declared illegal, in-operative and rent receipt be stopped issuing in the name of defendants.

(b) To declare all the documents of the defendants as forged, fabricated, illegal and in-operative.

(c) To declare the defendants illegal in the interfere of possession and for the defendants to interfere in the possession of the plaintiffs.

(d) That cost of the suit be awarded to the plaintiff.

(e) Any other relief and reliefs be awarded to the plaintiffs as your honour deem fit and proper.

4. The suit was decreed and aggrieved by the decree the defendants/ respondents filed Title Appeal being T.A. No. 9 of 2000. At the appellate stage an application was filed by the petitioner dated 24.3.2003 for the following r






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top