SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 488

M.Y.EQBAL
Parvati Transport And Construction Company – Appellant
Versus
Central Coalfield Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. Heard Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.K. Singh learned counsel for the respondents.

2. In this application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has prayed for appointment of independent Arbitrator for settlement of dispute and claims of the petitioner for the work relating to and in connection with construction of temporary Houses at Govindpur Project of Kathara Area of the respondents.

3. Petitioners case is that by virtue of work order No. GM/960/Temp/Houses/Govindpur/KTA/95/230-32 dated 17.1.1996 respondents awarded work of construction of temporary houses at Govindpur Project at Kathara Area to the claimant. It is alleged that the site was partly made available to the claimant which was completed within a short time but some of the site was made available after lapse of completion period. Petitioner alleged to have made several attempt to start the work but the villagers could not allowed to complete the work. Thereafter, several correspondences were made in relation to completion of work, as a result of which petitioner alleged to have sustained loss of Rs. 67,61,975.00 on sev






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top