SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 793

N.N.TIWARI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Shiv Karmpal Sahu, Mamta Kumari And Santosh Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.

1. In all these cases, the petitioners, who claim to be the dependent (s) of the person (s), killed by the extremists, have prayed for direction (s) to pay compensation and/or to provide appointment on compassionate ground, as per the Governments scheme. The grounds/ cause being common, all the writ applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Before deciding the claim of individual petitioner, it is necessary to notice relevant guidelines, issued by the State Government from time to time for payment of compensation and/or appointment on compassionate ground to the dependent (s) of those, killed by the extremists, which are discussed hereunder :

The then State of Bihar from its Home (Special) Department initially circulated a scheme vide Letter No. 1701, dated 21st September, 1987, whereby and whereunder, it was decided to give compensation to the dependent (s)/injured, who are killed/injured by the terrorist/extremists attack or in communal riots. It was decided to pay the dependent of a deceased Rs. 20.000/-, including those, who remain traceless for more than seven years and are presumed to be dead, due to t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top