SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 131

N.N.TIWARI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Central Coalfields Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jageshwar Mahto – Respondent


ORDER

1. The father of respondent-writ petitioner, late Jugal Mahto, who was in the service of appellant-Central Coalfields Limited (hereinafter referred to as C.C.L.), died in harness on 14th September, 1999. The respondent-writ petitioner being the dependent, applied for compassionate appointment after ten months from the date of death of his father, though six months period was prescribed for filing such application. In this background, the appellant rejected his claim for compassionate appointment. Learned Single Judge having noticed another decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of Roopna Manjhi v. Central Coalfields Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2003 (1) JCR 324 (Jhr), allowed the writ petition had directed the appellant to consider the case of respondent- writ petitioner for compassionate appointment.

2. Counsel for the appellant brought to the notice of the Court a decision of this Court in Lal Mani Devi v. Central Coalfields Limited W.P. (S) No. 4461 of 2004, disposed of on 15th September, 2004. In the said case, compassionate appointment was sought for after delay of six months and it was noticed that vide Circular No. 7151 dated 12th December, 1995, M/



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top