SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 328

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, N.N.TIWARI
Ganesh Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. The petitioner in the instant writ petition has challenged the order, contained in letter No. 64, dated 31st December, 2002 issued by the 3rd respondent, Headmaster, High School, Peterwar, District-Bokaro. whereby and whereunder, giving reference to letter No. 408, dated 18th December, 2002, issued by the District Education Officer, Bokaro, he has informed the petitioner that he, having completed 40 years of service, has retired from his service. The petitioner has also assailed the said letter No. 408, dated 18th December, 2002, issued by the District Education Officer, Bokaro, whereby, it was informed that there being no provision to allow a person to continue beyond 40 of service, the petitioner would retire and the excess amount, received by him by continuing in service beyond the said period, be recovered from his gratuity.

2. In a similar case of Pranadhar Prasad v. State of Jharkhand and Ors. , a Bench of this Court held that a Government servant cannot be retired by pushing back his date of birth arbitrarily, on completion of 40 years of service, and that the retirement on the ground of completion of 40 years of service in absence of any rule or

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top