SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 466

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, N.N.TIWARI
Ran Vijay Prasad Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal has been preferred by the writ petitioner-appellant against the order dated 12.10.2004 passed in W.P(S).No. 5486/2004 whereby his writ application has been dismissed.

2. The writ application was filed seeking the following reliefs :

(i) For quashing the order passed by the respondent No. 3 as contained in Memo No. 889/Estb./dated 15.6.04 (Annexure-15) whereby the petitioner was reverted from the post of Company Commandant to the Initial post of Nayak when the petitioner was about to retire.

(ii) For quashing the order passed by the respondent No. 2 as contained in Memo No. 1277/Estb./dated 24.8.04 (Annexure-19) whereby the petitioners appeal was summarily rejected.

(iii) For a direction to the respondents for payment of his salary for the months of July and September 2003 and also for the month of June 2004 including the arrears of enhanced D.A.

3. The brief facts giving rise to this case are that the appellant-petitioner was posted as Company Commandant at Garhwa and was given charge w.e.f 1.4.03. However, the key of the Almirah was not handed over to him and the same was with one Mithilesh Kr. Sinha. On 2.9.03 the appellant found one cheque No. 523800 missing






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top