SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 612

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, PERMOD KOHLI
State Of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Baleshwar Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This application has been preferred by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment dated 21st June, 2005, passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 6717 of 2004, whereby and whereunder, the learned Single Judge while set aside Office Order .No. 195/2004, communicated vide Memo No. 669 dated 26th May, 2004, held that the respondents cannot recover any amount from the petitioners gratuity and thereby, directed to refund the amount, already recovered, with statutory interest and on failure, to pay compensatory interest at the rate of 10% per annum.

2. The question, requires to be determined in this case, is whether the amount, if any, paid in excess, due to calculation mistake, can be recovered from pension or gratuity of a Government employee? If the aforesaid question is answered in affirmative and in favour of the State, then the following question will arise (a) who is the competent authority to recover/adjust such amount? (b) what will be the procedure to recover/adjust such amount? and (c) whether there is any period of limitation to recover such dues?

3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant joined the services of the then State of Bihar as Constable






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top