SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 833

AMARESHWAR SAHAY
Baldeo Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amareshwar Sahay, J.

1. In this application the prayer has been made by the petitoner to quash the order dated 17/04/1989 passed by the Commissioner, Santhal Parganas Division, Dumka in Revenue Misc. Revision No. 246/1987-88, whereby the learned Commissioner set aside the order of settlement of Plot No. 51 area 2 Bighas 4 Kathas and 19 dhurs of mouza Korikatinaia P.S.- Jama in the District of Dumka made in favour of the writ petitioner and up held the settlement of the said land made in favour of the private Respondents.

2. From perusal of the impugned order, i.e. Annexure-1, passed by the Commissioner, it appears that he has held that the settlement made in favour of the writ petitioner was against the provisions of Section 28 of the Santhal Parganas Tenancy Act, 1949. Section 28 of Santhal Parganas Tenancy Act, 1949 reads as under:

28. Principles to be followed in settling waste land or vacant holdings- In making settlement of waste land or vacant holdings regard shall be had to the following considerations in addition to the principles recorded in the record- of-rights, -

(a) fair and equitable distribution of land according to the requirements of each raiyat and his capa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top