SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 991

AMARESHWAR SAHAY
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amareshwar Sahay, J.

1. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner, However, this writ application is being disposed of on the basis of the materials on record.

2. In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 2.8.1999 passed by the Commissioner, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh as contained in Annexure-5 whereby, the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 7.12.1998 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh cancelling the Trade License of the petitioner under Clause 11 of the Bihar Trade Articles (Licenses Unification) Orders, 1984.

3. From perusal of the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner cancelling the trade licences of the petitioner (Annexure-4), it appears that the business premises of M/s. Satyam Enterprises situated at Barhi in the district of Hazaribagh was inspected and it was found that the business was being run by a person who was other than the licensee and at the time of inspection, no Stock Register, Cash Memo etc. were produced by the petitioner. It further appeared that in the shop, no Stock Register etc. were maintained. In violation of the condition of license, cash memo were not bein



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top