SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 1045

M.Y.EQBAL, DHANANJAY PRASAD SINGH
Nand Kishore Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand State Electricity Board – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ commanding upon the respondents not to recover the alleged excess payment from his salary on the ground of non-passing of Hindi Noting and Drafting Examination and further for a direction to release the annual increments which has been with held by the respondents.

2. Petitioners case is that he is Junior Storekeeper (Super Selection Grade) at Transmission Central Store, Namkum, Ranchi. In 1968 the petitioner joined the service and from 1970 he started getting increments. However, all of a sudden in the table of fixation of pay scale prepared on 29.10.2003 the authority of the respondents has recommended for recovery of excess payment allegedly made to the petitioner by way of increments from 16.7.79 to 14.5.94 on account of non- passing of Hindi Noting and Drafting Examination. Petitioners case is that he passed Hindi Noting and Drafting Examination on 29.81994 and before 1994 there was no such condition of service of passing Hindi Noting and Drafting Examination.

3. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents-Jharkhand State Electricity Board, it is stated that Bihar State Ele












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top