SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 10

AMARESHWAR SAHAY, DHANANJAY PRASAD SINGH
Pancham Bhuiyan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Singh, J.

1. Both the appeals, arising out of same judgment, were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Both the appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17.2.2001 and 22.2.2001 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Jamshedpur in Sessions Trial No. 254/99, whereby and whereunder the learned Sessions Judge held all the appellants guilty under Sections, 302, 376(2)(g), 201, 34 IPC and sentenced them to undergo RI for life under Section 302 IPC, 12 years RI under Section 376(2)(g) and 5 years RI under Section 201 IPC. However, sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. The factual matrix leading to these appeals are that in the night of 1.9.11.98 Munni Devi, wife of the informant Pradeop Sao, Munni Devi was not found in the house when he returned home at about 10.45 PM. The informant tried to search her out but she could not be found. According to the informant, he went in search of his wife along with PWs 9 and 11 towards the river assuming she might have gone for natural call. However, they could not locate the lady. It is further stated that during such search appellant Raju Ch























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top