SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 224

RAKESH RANJAN PRASAD
Suraj Narayan Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar Now Jharkhand Through Cbi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.R. Prasad, J.

1. The sole appellant was put on trial to face charges under Sections 420, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code as also under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act on the allegation that the appellant by putting his LTI on the pay slip of the complainant Indradeo Yadav took out wages of Rs. 2929/- of the complainant and that the appellant on demand took Rs. 200/- as illegal gratification. The trial court while acquitting for the charges under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, did find the appellant guilty for the charges under Sections 420, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years on each count and also sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- under Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code and in default to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three months. The sentences were ordered to be run concurrently.

2. The case of the complainant Indradeo Yadad (P.W.5) is that he was working as Dumper Khalasi in Gonudih Colliery under the appellant who was working as Dumber In-charge and used to take unofficial work from the complainant not only for himself but also for


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top