SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 300

R.K.MERATHIA
Kapil Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

R.K. Merathia, J.

1. Heard.

2. Petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.5.2002 passed by learned Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Jharkhand, Ranchi in Boards Case No. 25 of 2001 (Annexure-6) and also the order dated 17.8.2001, passed by the learned Additional Collector, Land Ceiling, Hazaribagh (respondent No. 3) in Land Ceiling Appeal No. 1/95-96(Annexure-5) and also the order dated 30.9.1995 passed by the Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ramgarh, Hazaribagh (Respondent No. 4) in Land Ceiling case No. 1/94-95.

3. Respondent No. 5-Banwari Mahto filed a petition under Section 16(3)(i) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), challenging the purchase made by the petitioner from respondent No. 6-Umram Thandar and claiming to be co-sharer as well as adjoining raiyat of respondent No. 6. After contest, such petition was allowed and petitioner was directed to re-convey the land in favour of respondent No. 5. Petitioners appeal and then the revision also dismissed.

4. Mr. Mehta, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that petitioner had purchased adjoining land and therefore he being adj






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top