SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 467

M.Y.EQBAL
Mahesh Ganjhu – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Ram Ganjhu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. This appeal by the plaintiff/appellants is directed against the judgment and decree dated 2.1.1990 passed by the 3rd Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in Title Appeal No. 41/1986 whereby he has reversed the judgment and decree dated 23.4.1986 passed by Additional Subordinate Judge, Ranchi in Title Suit No. 89/1978.

2. The facts of the case lien a narrow compass:

Plaintiff/appellants filed the aforementioned suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession with respect to the suit land bearing khata No. 398 situated at Mauza Khunti and khata No. 6 of village Kusum Toll, Khunti, Plaintiffs cases is that they are the descendants of Bhola Ganjhu whose name was recorded in Revisional Survey records of right. The suit land are the bakast land of Bhola Ganjhu. The defendants except defendant No. 20 are the descendants of Dhuru Ram Ganjhu and Ganjhu Ram Ganjhu, whereas defendant No. 20 is stranger to the family. It was further alleged that Chamru Ganjhu father of the Bhola Ganjhu executed a mortgage deed of his bakast land on 28.3.1919 in favour of Dhuru Ram Ganjhu and Ganjhu Ram Ganjhu. Inspite of mortgage deed, plaintiffs alleged to have remained in














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top