SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 344

M.Y.EQBAL
Sonal Diwan – Appellant
Versus
Miss Neeta Diwan – Respondent


ORDER

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. In this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner who is one of the defendants has challenged the order dated 7.3.2006 and 9.5.2006 passed by the sub-Judge, IInd, Koderma in Title Suit No. 17/01, whereby he has rejected the application filed by the petitioner for transposing her as plaintiff at the stage when plaintiff files petitioner for withdrawal of the suit.

2. The facts of case lie in a narrow compass:

Plaintiff/respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed partition Title Suit No. 17 of 2001 seeking preliminary decree for partition of 1/6th share each in the suit property fully described in the schedule of the plaint and also for appointment of survey knowing Pleader Commissioner for survey out of their share and preparation of final decree. In the said suit, petitioner was not impleaded as defendant although, she is sister of the plaintiff and have share in the suit property. When petitioner came to know about the suit, she appeared and filed application under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure for adding her as defendant in the suit. The said application was allowed by the Court below and, thereafter, petitioner filed her wr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top