SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 603

M.Y.EQBAL, DABBIRU GANESHRAO PATNAIK
Manglu Prasad Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 9.8.2006 whereby the writ petition being W.P. (S) No. 1877 of 2002 filed by the petitioner for regularization and/or absorption of his service has been dismissed by the learned single Judge holding that the petitioner was not appointed against any post after following the procedure of appointment. The impugned judgment/order reads as under:

Admittedly the petitioner was engaged on daily wage and thereby he had no right to hold any post. He was not appointed against any post after following the procedure as such advertisement, interview and recommendation of the Selection Commission. In this background no direction can be given to regularize his services.

This writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

2. The case of the petitioner-appellant is that in the year 1983, the petitioner, having come to know about the vacancy in Class-IV post in Public Health Engineering Department, applied for the said post. The respondent No. 4-- the Deputy Commissioner, Godda allowed the petitioner to work on muster roll in the said department and a letter dated 12.4.1983 was issued. Pursuant to that order of







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top