SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 743

DABBIRU GANESHRAO PATNAIK
Matius Tirkey – Appellant
Versus
Jusuphin Lakra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.G.R. Patnaik, J.

1. The appellants/plaintiffs have filed the instant appeal against the judgment dated 15.10.1996 and its corresponding decree dated 23.11.1996, passed in Title Suit No. 1 of 1995 by the Subordinate Judge-I, Simdega, whereby the suit of the plaintiffs was dismissed. The suit was filed for a declaration that the permission order dated 07.12.1962 passed by the Rent Suit Deputy Collector in Miscellaneous Case No. 92 R8 II of 1962 is illegal, void and without jurisdiction and also for a declaration that the registered deed of gift executed on 21.12.1962 by Luisa Tirkey in favour of her daughter Josiphin Lakra (defendant No. 1) is void, illegal and inoperative and with a further prayer that after adjudication of the right, title, interest as well as possession of the plaintiffs over the suit land fully described in Schedule A to the plaint, to order for delivery of possession of the suit land to the plaintiffs.

2. The parties belong to the same family having a common ancestor. As per the genealogy admitted by the parties, Lajru Mahto was the common ancestor, who had two sons, namely, Botko and Buta, While Botko had two sons, namely, Lodo and Turchu, Buta had one

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top