D.G.R.PATNAIK, M.Y.EQBAL
R. A. Himatsingka & Co. – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
In this application, the petitioner has challenged the ex parte order dated 13.6.2007 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Dumka Circle, Dumka, exercising appellate powers under the Bihar Finance Act. It appears that against the two separate orders passed by the assessing officer for the financial year 2002-03, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (Appeals) in which the order impugned in this application has been passed.
2. Mr. Poddar, learned counsel for the petitioner, has assailed the impugned order on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice. Learned counsel submits that without giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, the appellate authority not only affirmed the order of the assessing officer, but also remitted the matter with direction to the assessing officer to initiate penalty proceedings and prosecution under the said Act.
3. Mr. Modi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submitted that there is a statutory provision for revision in the Finance Act and therefore this Court should not entertain this writ application.
4. We have perused the impugned order passed by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.