SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 710

D.G.R.PATNAIK, M.Y.EQBAL
R. A. Himatsingka & Co. – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):. M/s Binod Poddar, Piyush Poddar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Pradip Modi.

Order

In this application, the petitioner has challenged the ex parte order dated 13.6.2007 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Dumka Circle, Dumka, exercising appellate powers under the Bihar Finance Act. It appears that against the two separate orders passed by the assessing officer for the financial year 2002-03, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (Appeals) in which the order impugned in this application has been passed.

2. Mr. Poddar, learned counsel for the petitioner, has assailed the impugned order on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice. Learned counsel submits that without giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, the appellate authority not only affirmed the order of the assessing officer, but also remitted the matter with direction to the assessing officer to initiate penalty proceedings and prosecution under the said Act.

3. Mr. Modi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submitted that there is a statutory provision for revision in the Finance Act and therefore this Court should not entertain this writ application.

4. We have perused the impugned order passed by the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top