SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 976

AMARESHWAR SAHAY
Arvind Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Mitra.
For the Respondents: Mrs. Sheela Prasad.

Order

Heard the parties.

2. The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that on an unauthorized report of the Block Supply Officer, Lohardaga, an F.I.R. was registered against the petitioner who is the owner of a Petrol Pump and against his employees Bihari Prasad, the Manager of the said petrol pump and the Salesman under section 420 IPC and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for the alleged adulteration in Diesal and Petrol. It is alleged by the petitioner that the petrol pump of the petitioner has forcibly been sealed by the respondents without any lawful reason.

3. According to the petitioner, he is doing the business of petrol in the name of M/s Arvind Automobiles situated at Patra Toli, Lohardaga on valid license. On 21.9.2005, the Block Supply Officer, Lohardaga came in the petrol pump of the petitioner and inspected the premises and during inspection he took 1/2 litre of diesel and petrol on the ground that he had received complaint that the petitioner was selling adulterated diesel and petrol. He also inspected the stock register and other documents and also seized the some of them. The FIR was registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commoditi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top