SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Jhk) 122

N.N.TIWARI
Sudhanshu Bhushan Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by paragraph-2 of the promotion order dated 24.4.2007, contained in Annexures-5. By the said Annexure-5, the petitioner was given promotion to the post of Additional Collector in the pay scale of Rs. 12,000- 16,500/-, but in paragraph-2 of the said order, the petitioner has been debarred from his monetary benefit and other benefits from the date of promotion. It has been mentioned that the same will be admissible from the date of notification of the said order.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that once the authorities decided to give promotion to the petitioner w.e.f. 1.11.2004, there was no occasion for depriving him of promotional benefit from the said date. It has been stated that the petitioner was earlier subjected to criminal proceeding, which was quashed. He was also subjected to departmental proceeding, but that was also quashed. In spite of the same, juniors were given promotion w.e.f. 1.11.2004 and the petitioner was discriminated. The petitioner against had moved this Court in writ petition [WP (S) No. 7312 of 2005], which was disposed of by order dated 7.8.2006 directing the respondents to consider the pet








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top