SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Jhk) 173

R.K.MERATHIA
Ghulam Subhani – Appellant
Versus
Alok Kumar Das – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioner:Mr. M.K. Laik, Sr. Advocate For Respondent No.3:Mr. Navin Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate

Judgment

This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 3.2.2009 passed in T.S. No. 37/1997 by Sub Judge-VIth Court, Hazaribagh, allowing the prayer made on behalf of respondent no. 3Md. Jalil for amendment of the plaint. It is submitted by Mr. Laik that the issues were framed long back in this suit in the year 1997 and such prayer for amendment was made at the evidence stage. It is further submitted that such amendment could not be allowed after the trial had commenced on framing the issues in view of proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 of the amended C.P.C. He also pointed out that the court below itself observed that certainly if the amendment is allowed, nature of the suit will change and that it will not remain a declaratory suit. He further submitted that while considering the prayer for amendment, learned court below has not considered the respective cases of the parties with regard to the prayer of amendment properly. With regard to some of the amendments, it is said that they are based on subsequent events and therefore, they have been allowed but it is not considered when such subsequent events came to the knowledge of the plaintiff. Admittedly, no paper or document in






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top