SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Jhk) 1271

M.Y.EQBAL, JAYA ROY
Karmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Satendra Kumar Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:M/s. Rajiv Anand, Arvind Kr. Tiwary For the Respondents:
Mr. H.K. Singh

JUDGMENT:

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.8.2007 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ranchi in Compensation Case No.95/2005, whereby he has dismissed the claim case as being not maintainable and is barred by the principle of res judicata.

2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. The claimant-appellant earlier filed a compensation case being Compensation Case No. 205/96 for grant of compensation on account of death of the deceased in a motor vehicle accident. The said claim case was dismissed in default and thereafter the claimant filed an application for restoration of Compensation Case No.205/96, which was registered as Miscellaneous Case No.2/2002. In the said restoration application the claimant was required to remove certain defects but for non-compliance, the restoration application was also dismissed for default. The claimant-appellant, thereafter, filed a fresh application claiming compensation, which was registered as Compensation Case No. 95/2005. The said claim application was opposed by the respondents raising the preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the compensation case No.95/2005.

3. The Claims Tribunal,






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top