SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Jhk) 1335

D.N.PATEL
Kumar and Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the petitioner:Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate
For the State: J.C. to A.G.

JUDGMENT

1.The present petition has been preferred for recovery of money from the respondents for the work done by the petitioner –contractor, on the basis of Annexure-5, a letter written by some Executive Engineer, Dhanbad. Thus, the present writ petition is a money suit type of petition.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that looking to Annexure-5, the letter written by the Executive Engineer, Dhanbad, the State Government has admitted the amount, payable to the petitioner, and the said admitted amount of Rs.1,95,030/- has not yet been paid.

3.Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that a detailed counter affidavit has been filed, wherein, it has been denied by the respondents that any amount is legally payable to the petitioner, as per Annexure 5 to the writ petition. On the contrary, looking to paragraph nos. 13 and 14 of the counter affidavit, the legally payable amount has already been paid to the petitioner, as per the Measurement Book No. 1127, submitted before the answering respondent, and after proper verification and checking, an amount of Rs.12,57,970/-has been paid to the petitioner vide Voucher No. 19 dated 23rd December, 2003. Looking to paragraph










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top