SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Jhk) 10

D.K.SINHA
Amamath – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared;
For the Petitioner Mis D.K. Prasad, K.K.Mishra.
For the State Mr. Md. Hatim.

JUDGMENT

DK Sinha, J -The petitioner has preferred this Cr. Revision against the judgment passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj in Cr. Appeal No. 41 of 1999 on 30.9.99 whereby and whereunder the judgment of conviction recorded by Shri Sahjanand Sharma, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Latehar against the petitioner for the offence under Section 409 I.P.C. awarding sentence of three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,0001- with default stipulation was affirmed.

2. The prosecution story in short was that on the written report presented by the informant Block Development Officer, Mahuadanr, with reference to the letter No. 564(C) dated 17.7.96 addressed to the Deputy Collector (Establishment) Palamau, a case for the offence under Section 409 I.P.C. was registered against the petitioner by lodging F.I.R. giving rise to Mahuadanr P.S. Case No.29/96 on 10.10.96 for the misappropriation of Government money to the tune of Rs.3,16,753=21paise, allocated for social security pension to the old age persons, but it were never distributed to them as alleged and at the relevant time the petitioner was Anchal Nazir.

3. In course of trial, after the statement of

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top