SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Jhk) 975

D.G.R.PATNAIK
Shanti Devi Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
For the Jharkhand Mr. Mukesh Kumar.
For the Petitioners M/s V.S. Sahay, S. Srivastava.

Order

The instant revision application has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the impugned order dated 27.3.2008 passed in C2 Case No. 109 of 2000 by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ranchi, whereby the petitioners' prayer for their discharge in respect of the offences for which cognizance was taken has been rejected.

2. Facts of the case briefly stated, is that the criminal proceedings initiated before the court below was based on a complaint lodged by Sri A.P. Sharma, Sub-Judge-III, Ranchi in exercise of powers under Section 195(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 340 of the Code. The averments in the complaint relate to certain offences alleged to have been committed in relation to the proceedings in an execution case no. 1/83A which was pending in the Court of Sub-Judge VI, Ranchi. A suit for specific performance of contract of Title Suit No. 125 of 1981 was filed by the petitioners. The suit was decreed in favour of the petitioners on 18.10.1982. However, the decree could not be executed on account of continuation of the suit through appeal up to the Supreme Court. The judgment attained finality in 1995 by the order of the Supreme Court o









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top