SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Jhk) 652

AJIT KUMAR SINHA
Kedar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Sameer Saurabh, Anil Kumar Sinha.
For the Respondents: Mr. Manoj Tandon.

Order


The present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:-

(A) The order dated 7.10.2004 passed by the Secretary whereby and whereunder the office order dated 6.4.2004 has been kept in abeyance (Annexure-7) be quashed.

(B) The Respondents be directed not to give effect to the office order 7.2.2004 and to implement the order and direction dated 6.4.2004 without any further delay.

(C) The respondents be directed to pay all the legal dues to the petitioner as he was in service without any break.

2. The facts, in brief, are set out as under:-

The petitioner was initially appointed as Supervisor Cooperative Society on 29.8.64 and he was suspended on 25.8.97 on the charges of embezzlement of amount and financial irregularities. The petitioner was served with a letter from the District Cooperative Officer, Ranchi, respondent no. 4 herein vide memo No. 96 dated 26.2.2001 stating therein that he will retire w.e.f. 28.2.2001. Just a day before superannuation i.e. 27.2.2001 he was served with a letter vide memo no. 1251 dated 27.2.2001 issued by the Registrar, Cooperative Society, Bihar, Patna dismissing him from service.

3. The petitioner being constrained filed a petition








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top