By Court.-Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Challenge, in this writ application, is to the order dated 31.10.2001 (Annexure-3) passed by the petitioner's Disciplinary Authority, whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service. Challenge also is to the order dated 9.12.2002 (Annexure-4), passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby the Appeal preferred by the petitioner against the impugned order of dismissal was rejected.

3. As per the admitted facts of the present case, the petitioner was appointed on the post of Constable in the State Police Service. In the appointment letter, it was stipulated that in the event, the testimonials relating 'to the educational qualification and other qualifications, if found incorrect, false or fake, the appointment is liable to be terminated even - without issuance of notice.

4. Be that as it may, though at the time of the petitioner’s appointment, no preliminary verification of the testimonials, given by her was made but she was allowed to discharge her duties. Some time in the year 1998, some complaints were received against the petitioner to the effect that the certificates in respect of the educational qualifications w