SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Jhk) 259

D.N.PATEL
Ravishankar Dubey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s Ajit Kumar & Rahul Kumar, Advocates
For the State : Mr. Rishi Pallava, J.C. to G.P.II

Judgment

1. The present petition has been preferred mainly against an order, passed by respondent no.4 dated 22ndMay, 2008, which is at Annexure 18 to the memo of petition, whereby, the services of the petitioner have been terminated, only on the ground that the petitioner has not got his Teachers Training from a recognized institution by the National Council for Teachers Education under the National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993 (hereinafter to be referred as "the Act, 1993"), though the Act, 1993 came into force with effect from 1st July, 1995 and the petitioner got appointment on 28th April, 1995, as per Annexure 6 to the memo of petition, and the petitioner actually joined the services as a Teacher with effect from 2nd May, 1995 (Annexure 7 to the memo of petition). Both these dates are prior to coming into force the Act, 1993 and, therefore, the petitioner is challenging the termination order at Annexure 18 to the memo of petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner having obtained his Teachers Training on16th August, 1994 (Annexure 2 series), applied for appointment to the post of a Teacher at C.P. Samittee Middle School, Jamshedpur

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top