SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Jhk) 20

D.N.PRASAD
BINOD BIHARI RAJWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.SINHA, N.N.MAHTO, R.N.SAHAY

Judgment :

D. N. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner to quash the order dated 2-12-1997 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in T. R. No. 2343/97 (G. R. No. 87/93) whereby and whereunder he has rejected the application under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for discharge.

( 2 ) THE petitioner while posted as Branch Manager of the Bank of India at Raj Dhanwar Branch lodged first information report alleging therein that the accused Himanshu Shekhar Prasad removed drafts from the Bank and also had drawn a sum of Rs. 2,50,800/- by submitting fake draft. It is also alleged that an attempt was made to draw a sum of Rs. 1,80,500/- through forged drafts which could be detected at Delhi Office. It is also alleged that the drafts bearing No. 050015 to 050016, Leaf No. 050015 was converted into a fake draft for Rs. 1,00,500/- and Leaf No. 050016 was converted into fake draft of Rs. 80,000/- and the accused Himanshu Shekhar Prasad also confessed his guilt. Accordingly, the first information report was lodged. The police investigated into the case and submitted charge-sheet a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top