SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Jhk) 272

D.N.PRASAD
DEORI BANKIRA, – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.BANERJEE, JASVINDAR MAJUMDAR, JAYA ROY, SHEKHAR SINHA, TARUN KUMAR BANERJEE

Judgment :

D. N. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) ALL the three appeals heard together as they are arising out of the same judgment and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THESE appeals have been directed against the Judgment dated 1-9-1995 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Singhbhum West at Chaibasa in Sessions Trial No. 188 of 1995 whereby the appellants have been convicted under Section 148/364 read with S. 34 and under S. 452/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo R. I. for seven years under S. 364, I. P. C. whereas the appellant Jain Ram Mahali was sentenced to undergo R. I. for two years under S. 364 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 3 ) THE case of the prosecution, in brief is that one Lakhi Ram Mahali along with his family members was staying at his house on 14-1-1995 and on the same day at 6/7 P. M. all the accused persons/appellants variously armed with Revolver, Bhujali and Lathi reached there and called the informant. When the informant. Lakhiram Mahali came out from the house, the accused persons caught hold of him and enquired about his mother. Accused persons entered into the house of the informant whereas the accused Hagua Mahali and Kobro Samad br











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top