SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Jhk) 709

GURUSHARAN SHARMA
BHARAT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AKLU HAZAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DASH, M.K.Laik, M.M.BANERJI

Judgment :

GURUSHARAN SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) ADMITTEDLY, kunti Domin owned and possessed a house at katras Bazar, District Dhanbad, one room (measuririg 12 x 13) whereof is subject-matter of the present appeal. She died leaving behind two sons, namely, Chaitu Dome and khetu Dome. On 16-3-1964, the plaintiff was inducted as tenant in the said room on monthly rental of Rs. 12. On 26-8-1971, defendant No. 1 (Chaitu dome) executed a registered usufructuary mortgage-deed for the said room for Rs. 700/- in favour of the plaintiff.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFFs case is that defendant No. 1 agreed to sell the said room to him for Rs. 2,100 and executed an agreement for the same on 15-10-73. Rs. 700 was already with him for which he had executed usufructuary mortgage deed and further on 15-10-1973 a sum of Rs. 1,000 was paid to him. Accordingly to the terms of the said agreement, on receiving the balance consideration amount of Rs. 400 from the plaiantiff, defendant No. 1 was to execute the sale deed within three months. On the failure of defendant No. l to execute the deed, in spite of repeated requests by the plaintiff, a notice dated 29-11-1973 was sent to him through a lawyer which was replied by him on 7










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top