GURUSHARAN SHARMA
BHARAT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AKLU HAZAM – Respondent
GURUSHARAN SHARMA, J.
( 1 ) ADMITTEDLY, kunti Domin owned and possessed a house at katras Bazar, District Dhanbad, one room (measuririg 12 x 13) whereof is subject-matter of the present appeal. She died leaving behind two sons, namely, Chaitu Dome and khetu Dome. On 16-3-1964, the plaintiff was inducted as tenant in the said room on monthly rental of Rs. 12. On 26-8-1971, defendant No. 1 (Chaitu dome) executed a registered usufructuary mortgage-deed for the said room for Rs. 700/- in favour of the plaintiff.
( 2 ) PLAINTIFFs case is that defendant No. 1 agreed to sell the said room to him for Rs. 2,100 and executed an agreement for the same on 15-10-73. Rs. 700 was already with him for which he had executed usufructuary mortgage deed and further on 15-10-1973 a sum of Rs. 1,000 was paid to him. Accordingly to the terms of the said agreement, on receiving the balance consideration amount of Rs. 400 from the plaiantiff, defendant No. 1 was to execute the sale deed within three months. On the failure of defendant No. l to execute the deed, in spite of repeated requests by the plaintiff, a notice dated 29-11-1973 was sent to him through a lawyer which was replied by him on 7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.