SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 115

SHANKAR PRASAD, GURUSHARAN SHARMA
BINDA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NARENDRA PAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.GHOSH, S.L.AGARWAL

Judgment :

GURUSHARAN SHARMA AND H. S. PRASAD, JJ.

( 1 ) APPELLANT is the owner of truck bearing registration No. BEW 8064. Respondent No. 5 was driver of the said vehicle. At the relevant time, the said vehicle was duly insured with New India Assurance co. Ltd. The truck dashed the scooter bearing the registration No. BRT 5741 on which Manjeet Kaur along with her son was sitting as pillion rider and the scooter was being driven by her husband Narendra pal Singh.

( 2 ) IT was established that the accident took place on account of the truck being driven in a very high speed in rash and negligent manner. By impugned judgment and award dated 1. 6. 1994, passed in compensation Case No. 75 of 1990, under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the Tribunal assessed a sum of Rs. 75,000 with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum payable to the claimants.

( 3 ) IN para 8 of the impugned judgment, it was observed that according to the provision of section 149 (2) of the Act, no doubt the insurer was entitled to defend an action for compensation against it on the ground of any breach of statutory conditions, including the holding of valid licence by driver of the vehicle in ques











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top